![]() Without those nasty false positives it would have managed four. Panda also earned 5.5 points for protection, and 4.5 for performance.Īggregating many different tests, I'd summarize Panda's lab test performance as worth three stars, out of a possible five. Researchers at AV-Test didn't encounter as many false positives they gave Panda 5.5 of 6.0 possible points for usability (a score based on low false positives). In each case, it dropped one full grade due to false positives. Panda would have scored ADVANCED+ in the standard file detection test, ADVANCED in the retrospective detection test, and ADVANCED+ in the real-world dynamic test. In other malware detection tests by AV-Comparatives, it lost points due to false positives-erroneous reporting of valid files as malware. Panda entered six of the last twelve tests by Virus Bulletin and received VB100 certification in four of those tests. ![]() Panda earned ADVANCED+, the top rating, in a test by AV-Comparatives that focuses specifically on thorough cleanup of known malware. ICSA Labs and West Coast Labs certify Panda both for malware detection and malware cleanup. The current edition replaces those with a single panel titled "Improve your protection," but as before it links to an upgrade offer.įalse Positives Mar Lab Scores Most of the independent labs I follow include Panda's antivirus technology in their testing, and it gets generally good scores. Clicking one of these would bring up a window extolling the benefits of that feature and offering a link to upgrade. Last year's edition displayed buttons for features present only in Panda's full suite. Best Malware Removal and Protection Software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |